NEW YORK | 75-83 Nassau Street | 498 FT | 40 FLOORS


#22

I’ve assumed that there’s a financing problem here, which sucks because this is a nice tower.


#23

At 144 Fulton, anything will be a huge improvement over this crap stain on our urban fabric:


#24

I agree, Bromemeister.


#25


#26

I really hope that this gets built in its current form. It’s such an amazing building.


#27

Yea, it would also compliment both 8 Spruce and 56 Leonard just nicely.


#28

I agree


#29


Odanewyork


#30

I love it, but nothing is happening here.


#31

It sucks Vera Wang that nothing is happening here.


#32

yeah its a shame, this is one of ODA’s nicer tower designs.


#33

I agree


#34

I noticed some new interior demolition activity here today.


#35

Great news!!!

This tower is beautiful


#36

Demo permits were filed on 11/17/17.

http://a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/WorkPermitDataServlet?allisn=0003371035&allisn2=0002395331&allbin=1001214&requestid=2


#37

Solid infill. Also good news with the demo permits.


#38

Digging further into the file for this parcel, the existing property has had a ton of violations in the past. Looks like all dismissed.

Guess the DOB is happy this stuff is being Demo’d for something better.

NUMBER TYPE FILE DATE
V* 10-26-81-E DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/0000
V* 1758-07 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/0000
V* 2-14-80-E DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/0000
V* 9725-34F DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/0000
V* 020585CH9MM DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/0000
DISMISSAL DATE: 01/13/2003 BADGE NO.: 1797
V* 082680E121111 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/1980
V* 021480E1184A2 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 02/14/1980
V* 102681E132010 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 10/26/1981
V* 021784LL1081SS000119 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/1984
V* 081685ELL1081SS00071 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/1985
V* 020585CA9MM DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 02/05/1985
V* 082085E132234 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 08/20/1985
V* 111486LL1081SS00088 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/1986
V* 050887LL1081SS00074 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/1987
V* 100187LL16NRF00078 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/1987
V* 100987E138341 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/1987
V* 040787E132241 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 04/07/1987
V* 011288CA1H07 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 00/00/1988
V* 999999NO FORM052777E1244 DOB VIOLATION - DISMISSED 99/99/1999
V* 111688E1179A/07 DOB VIOLATION - RESOLVED 11/16/1988
V* 111688E1179A/06 DOB VIOLATION - RESOLVED 11/16/1988
V* 111688E1179/05 DOB VIOLATION - RESOLVED 11/16/1988
V* 111688E1179A/04 DOB VIOLATION - RESOLVED 11/16/1988
V* 111688E1179A/05 DOB VIOLATION - RESOLVED 11/16/1988
V* 091890E1106A4 DOB VIOLATION - RESOLVED 09/18/1990


#39

Great to investigation, Chris.

I checked the DOB only for No. 75.

Was stuff also filed for the other parcels that comprise the site?


#40

Does this actually have a chance of getting built? I am starting to get excited, this design is stunning and the location is amazing


#41

Awesome Gif, Robert!

I loved that show!